What kind of Turtle is this?… (Canadada Experiment)
January 25, 2010

In keeping with my recent ‘thoughts’ to re-engage with the ‘living world’, I wonder what this is? Any ideas? OK, a turtle – but what KIND of turtle?
Clues: discovered in a dry rocky bed quarry, in a mixed hardwood/softwood forest, several miles from open water near Gravenhurst, Ontario, Canada. Look at that stubby little snout. So cute.
Can anyone tell, by the markings, if it is male or female? Or, how many partners it mates with? Can anyone guess/suggest its age? Is this one ‘healthy’ or ’sick’? What does it eat? What is it’s primary ‘predator’? What should I ‘name’ it?
I KNOW it is a turtle – but when I THINK about it I trip off into all sorts of different realms. In the short term, it is not my desire to ask an expert for ‘classification’ – rather, I am interested to hear what ‘locals’ have to say abut this beastie. So, if you’ve SEEN something akin to this one in your backyard – TELL me how it behaved, and what YOU thought OF when you saw it. How has this creature played a role in the development of your own psyche and imagination? When did you first EXPERIENCE this living thing?
One resonance, for me, is the well-known native story of the ‘turtle’ as the base of the continent – from which all life sprang off and forth. It’s an old story. Could this living thing have greater ‘Truth’ then our current cartoonish anthropomorphic re-makes, like the ‘Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles’ or ‘Cecil the Turtle’ or the ever-popular ever-smiling ‘Franklin the Turtle’? Do these cartoons have ANY connection to the REAL THING? Isn’t this REAL LIFE ‘object’ infinitely more fascinating, enlightening – and even useful – then it’s mythological one? Superficially, today, it would appear not. The merchanidising and ‘branding’ of cartoon turtles through books, comics and television supercedes any REAL ENCOUNTER with a ‘living turtle’, for most.
I am reminded of a strange incident many years ago. I had raked fallen autumn leaves and decaying debris at the farm and was having large bonfire to clean up the mess. Crisp wood smoke filled the air, and heat pushed me away from the arcing skyward flames. It was HOT. It was INTENSE. A small boy came and stood beside me, putting up his hand to shield his Self from the heat, he stared at the fire – “Wow!” he exclaimed, “That’s just like a fire in New York!”
I was stunned. This kid had NEVER been to New York. I knew that for a fact. Clearly, this child had never SEEN a fire burn ‘au naturel’. No, his understanding and experience of FIRE was from T.V. , with all it’s pyrotechnics, explosions, and heavily edited nano-second narrative arcs. This revelation was sobering and kind of sad. I gave him the rake and encouraged him to actually EXPERIENCE the fire with ALL his senses. It seemed important to help him build a REAL memory, not an artifiial and ‘unlived’ one.
It’s how I’m feeling and thinking about ‘turtles’ at the moment. It’s not enough to SEE them on t.v. or even the net. Better to GET OUT THERE and SEE them where they live, breathe, mate, birth and die, no? Even if it’s in a ‘zoo’. … SEE it ALIVE with your OWN EYES.
In the interim, here’s another photograph of DIFFERENT turtles. By the looks of it, a family of turtles, though I have no clue if that ‘big’ one is male or female. And whether or not the ‘partner’ is near-by, or even involved with the continued life of the ‘little ones’.
These ones live up in Georgian Bay. I KNOW they are different from the first image shown above. I know they must be able to swim great distances, though I don’t know how that is possible. Maybe it’s because of the natural bouyance of their shells, or maybe they breathe in large air pockets, or maybe they swim underwater – gee, I wonder for how long. 5 minutes? 50 minutes? 5 hours? Are they ‘mud’ turtles? or do they ‘prefer’ dry land? And how is their diet DIFFERENT from the first turtle? If these two KINDS of turtles met, would they mate? and if so, which habitat would they evolve best in? Land or Lake?And look at those snouts – it’s so different from the first.
Here’s is another shot I ‘clipped’ from a YouTube video of a turtle farm in Indonesia, on Gili Meno. Look how different their appendages are from the ‘feet’ of the former in Georgian Bay. These are salt-water turtles. They are bred in captivity, and sold to ‘food markets’. I have no idea for how much. I’ve never had turtle soup, or stew. Have you? Could these survive in fresh water? I don’t know. Do you?
Here’s another ‘turtle’ or more rightly, tortoise. (What differentiates a turtle from a tortoise by the way – SIZE alone? The habitat of FRESH versus SALT? Location? WHY can’t I call the FIRST image of this post a tortoise? Maybe it IS a tortoise …
I know, shades of ‘Finding Nemo’ in this shot, but remember, this is a FOR REAL ‘turtle’. Living, breathing, mating, dying somewhere ‘OUT THERE‘.
Tell me your turtle story. I’m suddenly very very interested. Aren’t you?
When & Why Writers DON’T Write …
January 22, 2010
I’ve been thinking about this for awhile now. Traditionally, it’s called ‘writer’s block’, but I don’t think that adequately addresses ‘the problem’. It’s not as though I don’t have plenty to write about. I think, rather, it’s got more to do with writing something worthy of my readers. I mean, it is just so easy to babble on about nothing. Blogs abound.
I’ve been reading recently about ‘umwelt‘ – a German word that means literally ‘the environment’ or ‘the world around’. Carol Kaesuk Yoon suggests, in her recent tome ‘Naming Nature: The Clash Between Instinct and Science’, that this term, when used by scientists, signifies the perceived world, ” the world perceived by an animal, a view idiosyncratic to each species, fueled by its particular sensory and cognitive powers and limited by its deficits.” Dogs, she goes on to explain, don’t live in a coloured universe, rather they smell. It is that acuity of smell that DEFINES their world. In much the same way, bees, using their multi-faceted eyes, are able to detect a spectrum of light invisible to the human eye. Their ‘reality’ guides them to ultraviolet markings on flora. As such, their ‘reality’ too is different then our own. This is THEIR ‘umwelt’ – a idiosyncratic sensory ‘picture’ – particular to them. Human’s ‘umwelt’ – our shared perceived world – gives us as well our own uniquely stereotypical hard-wired way of perceiving the natural order of living things.
Ultimately this ‘umwelt’ of ours, as it is to any species, is directly related to our perception of what we eat and what eats us. In other words, it defines our perception of the ‘living world’. I have been trying to articulate this ’sense’ recently when trying to describe the ‘thoughts & feeling’ I get when I am ‘outdoors’. There is a sense of KNOWING that supercedes the gift of language, and the instruction of education. It is innate KNOWING about the natural order of living things.
We all have this innate KNOWING – though, to be sure, it is near BURIED under devices of our own making. ‘Media’ increasingly isolates, then reflects back to us a ‘reality’ that is neither living nor natural. And yet, this innate KNOWING persists. We recognize it when we step away from the screens to watch birds fly in flocks, when we see squirrels run up trees, when we watch as dogs chase each other, when we see a hawk swoop down on a mouse. There are patterns to these behaviours that assist us to find our own place on the planet. Without them we are lost.
When I was a child and lived in the country I was BETTER able to perceive and KNOW this. In truth, I had a greater affinity for it then I do now. There was an empathy and a kind of intuitive understanding that I too often FORGET today. This KNOWING was the connecting ‘link’ that enabled me to engage with the living world in a way that I sense we are now increasingly and incrementally losing altogether. This loss worries me. This loss seems somehow connected to the ‘bigger issues’ of the day – like the economic collapse of North America, the ‘abstractions of financial markets’, the continued degradation of the planet, and our blinding disregard for OTHER living species – including our own – on the brink of extinction.
In an earlier post in this blog I wrote about ‘patterns in nature’ – something that Marshall McLuhan yabbered on about towards the end of his most illustrious career as a media observer. It seems that as humans we MUST order our perceptions as a means of survival. Our ‘umwelt’ – our perception of reality – depends on it. Increasingly though, the constant drone of media assaults our attention. It is overwhelming our capacity to SEE the patterns beyond the screens and billboards to a ‘real living vibrant and vital nature‘. Instead, we stand at railings while interpreters tell us what we are looking at. We cower nervously in FEAR as we gaze upon the living things we no longer KNOW. (Joni was right, ‘We’ve paved paradise and put up a parking lot’.) We no longer love the planet, we just use it. Our ‘dis-connect‘ to the actual ‘living world‘ has become more pronounced. We are floundering, and we are failing. Badly.
My DESIRE to write is connected to this pressing problem. And yet, I cannot find the right combination to DELIVER.
Why? Because the trouble with language today is that most often it is used in the service of those who are hell-bent on selling us something that is seldom necessary for survival. Thus, we increasingly CONSUME but don’t really LISTEN. Equally, we SPEAK TOO MUCH without really having anything to say. Likewise, I am AWARE that writing a short story or a poem, or even embarking on a screenplay or novel, is increasingly unlikely to have ANY impact in a world where so many voices/noises now vying for our limited attention. The 24/7 media mantra is: “Boot up! Plug in! Tune in – NOW is HAPPENING EVERYWHERE!! “ And collectively, we have jumped on the internet, LOOKING and SEEKING this gratifying promise of IMMEDIATE CONNECTION to ‘NOW’ness.
But what are we actually looking and seeking FOR? Could it be that what we REALLY hunger after is that very CONNECTION that we want and FEEL when engaging with the natural order of living things? (When was the last time you actually LISTENED to night outside of the city – listened to the hum of the planet? Just listened? )
In truth, the net is not delivering, it is diverting. We are, quite simply, deluding ourselves with this never-ending avalanche of pretty pictures, simulated noises and the on-going seductions of ‘google’. Conclusion? This artifically created ‘NOW is HAPPENING EVERYWHERE‘ blitz is totally false and completely misleading. it is the ‘double speak’ that Orwell wrote about….
So, you see, this is not, as such, a traditional ‘writer’s block’. Rather, it is a period of observance, a kind of re-grouping, and even a bit of a quiet vigil. I believe we, especially in North America, are losing something vital to our mental health and well-being. We are losing our ‘umwelt‘. It is a worry.
Sharing the stories that RE-CONNECT us to the living world are needed more then ever.
I am giving it thought. And will return shortly.
On the other hand, I may just throw in the towel, and go farm somewhere.
What was the BEST BOOK of the DECADE?
December 30, 2009

One book sticks out from the past decade by a COUNTRY MILE,
I have bought several copies & given it to a number of people.
Chris Patten’s, ‘What Next? Suriving the 21st Century’.
Here are a number of reviews of same to wet your appetite …
From The Independent, link here.
From The Guardian, link here.
From The Spectator, link here.
From London School of Economics, link here.
Overall, an EXCELLENT and PROVOCATIVE read. Get it.
Happy New Year Canadada Readers.
What book did it for YOU over the past 10 years?
Name it, fiction or non-fiction.
Religion: Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, Muslim, Pagan or Jew – this post is for you.
December 23, 2009
One of the most moving expressions of ‘religion’ ever written: -
“The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed. It was the experience of mystery– even if mixed with fear — that engendered religion. A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, our perceptions of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which only in their most primitive forms are accessible to our minds — it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute true religiosity; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man.”
Albert Einstein, 1870 – 1955
‘Class & Exploitation on the Internet’ … … … (a ricochet post)
November 21, 2009
Class and Exploitation on the Internet
And tangentially, I found this ‘article’ rather interesting …
On the Hyper Architecture of ‘Memex’ and New Babylon
by David Richard Carroll, Assistant Professor Media Design at Parsons: The New School for Design.
(I’m operating from the premise that understanding the beastie improves our relationship with, and to it ... These articles may appear rather ‘dry’ but I DO find them insightful and informative … ) :)
“Artspeak!” – Converse like a Critic!
November 3, 2009

Fun post.
Was sent this link recently.
It’s just too good not to share … click ‘here’.
… hee-hee … enjoy!



